An exploration of the theme of Deception, good or bad in ‘MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING (William Shakespeare)’ and ‘THE ROVER (Aphra Behn)’

Deception, the quality of being fraudulent1 orto cause to harmonize as true or valid what is false and invalid2 is a major theme in both plays Much bother more or less Nothing and The Rover. However t here is a certain dichotomy for falsification here as it is both malign and gracious, intentionally good and intentionally bad. A nonher proof of this is that the twain plays be comedies meaning well-nigh deceptions sport got to be taken light spiritedly and blithely. These are shown in benedick and Beatrices gulling and Lucettas gypping of Blunt assist by Sancho and Philippo.There are 2 chief(prenominal) comic deceptions in Much Ado these are benign and harmless to the multitude they are directed against. When Claudio professes his lie with for poor boy to Pedro who strangely, in a flash offers his help to woo her for him, he at introductory sounds too eager to help his friend (as if he has something else in mind) barely we before long learn his intentions are we ll meant.I entrust assume thy part in some disguise, and tell fair(a) Hero I am Claudio and in her bosom Ill unclasp my heart and take her hearing prisoner with the force 3This of course acts as an introduction to the theme of deception and shows us, the auditory sense how easy and tolerated deception is in the arena of Messina .It shows how easy it is to control a persons sustenance and manipulate some(prenominal)ones liveings. This is reflected in the countenance lawsuit of the benevolent fancys set by the personalitys the gulling or tricking of the two, presumably past lovers, Benedick and Beatrice. This deception can be seen as a colour lie4 .The two characters are tricked by a larger group of characters including the respectable and estimable Leonato whose involvement is one of the main reasons the gulling was successfulI should think this is a gull but that white bearded fellow speaks it5This underlines that no character in Shakespeares world or in Messina is above deception. A go bad example of this is the Friars plan to deceive the prince and ClaudioYour daughter here the princes, allow her awhile be in secret kept in, and publish it that she is dead indeed6This shows that even a high-ranked holy/spiritual person could turn to deception. This is actually a nonher example of deception with good intent. The Friar deceives the princes to throw the nasty accusations for sorrow and leave allone pity her and remember all her civilities and people will see her candour as more precious after she has gone.Examples of deception in the sc show uper include Pedros deception of his fathers orders for Florida to marry don vincentio and instead finds her a better suitor, Antonio who turns proscribed to be an even worse suitor for going layabout Pedros back to court Angelica, this causes them to fight and drives the two into a duel where Antonio only again deceives Pedro by sending in Bellville to fight in his place. Bellville sees this as an op portunity to get Florinda, delusoryly in Antonios name this minute let me make Florinda mine7 and expectantly, Willmore blows Belvilles cover and ruins their plan.The tricking of Beatrice and Benedick is shown in two of the around comic injections in the whole play, these scenes are as well the best examples of deception in the play and this goes to show that a lighthearted or benign deception is very possible in Messina. It underlines the fact that feigning can be useful and can bring two people together even if its one of Hercules labours8.Beatrice and Benedicks scam can be use as a mirror for the gulling of blunt in The Rover but not in the sense that it brings two people together or in the sense that it ends happily but in the comic sense, it is the funniest scene in the play and so reflects that deception if taken lightheartedly can be benign or harmless.There are also examples of harmful deceptions which create the unilluminated and ugly side of the world of Messina, th e main catalyst for this is of course the Princes half brother, gain John. One critic9 blames his evilness on jealousy and/or the rancor resentment of a society that looks down on those like him who are conceived out of wedlock I personally swear he is alone a typical villain, mere, unmixed evil, an ill-conditioned, base and tiresome villain10 created by Shakespeare for the audience to hate and fear. Don Johns intentions are altogether and utterly malefic. He tries to talk Claudio into thinking Don Pedro is wooing Hero for himself- I heard him swear his affection in the masked ball.The audience is not so sure whether this is true or not since Don Pedro was very eager to get Hero for Claudio earlier but we soon learn Don John was simply being the scoundrel he is. One thing that can be noted is Don Johns jerry-built tongue or his ability to persuade many or most of the other characters in the play easily. This is also true for Willmore in The Rover. He woos Angelica Bianca and gets her to sleep with him even though she was infuriated by him legal proceeding earlier for taking down her picture he turns it against her and rails at her for seducing him and all the other poor men who cannot afford her. He also leads her to deceive herself and Morettas soliloquy in this scene illustrates the extent to which Angelica has helpless herself and her career which is the fate of most whores11 in her opinion.There is a certain parallel or mirrored idea in the two plays. Balthasars song12 is of course echoed throughout Much Ado, it is around deception it speaks, or the deceptive nature of men. This is mirrored through Wilmores defensive comment after being accused of cheating on Angelica he said For I never heard of a mortal man, that has not broke a thousand vows13.In another sense deception can be used to show who is boss, or to show off someones authority. For example the Prince of Aragon immediately marks his territory in Messina by grabbing the first opportuni ty he could, and that is through wooing Hero. By wooing Hero for Claudio he showed that he was the dominator or leader figure. Don Pedro also does that with Beatrice and Benedick and he succeeds in creating his mountain of affection14 and proof for this is that the pair are lovesick for one another. It is when Leonato falls under Pedro and Claudios side against his own daughter that we see the cause of the dominance Pedro gained from his earlier deceptions. Even though Leonato has seen Pedros deceptive nature in action he still follows himWould the two princes lie, and Claudio lie, who loved her so, that speaking of her foulness, serve it with tears? Hence from her, let her die15The audience here would feel compassionate to Leonato. He is trapped and does not know who to believe but shortly falls on the Prince and Claudios side since the idea of the Princes manufacturing is inconceivable to him. Lying was considered a much more serious offence in that time than it is nowadaysit was a diabolical trick because daimon told Eve lies in the Garden of Eden, causing her to sin.16 This is another fibre of deception the play talks about, deceptive reputations. The prince, Claudio and Leonato are Shakespeares idea of the undefiled gentlemen but they all seem to make up their decisions and take forceful measures to regain their honour almost immediately without any real tactile proof of Heros crimeI stand dishonoured, that have gone about to link my dear friend to a common stale. 17 some other example of deception we encounter in the plays is deception between friends. Benedick in a sense deceives his friends in breaking the patriarchal cypher of friendship. This is quite shocking since he has known his friends longitudinal than any of the people in Messina. Beatrice asks the messenger in a pun a good soldier to a lady, but what is he to a gentle?18 .A Shakespearean audience would find this repugnant and not the distract behavior for a gentleman. Bonds betwe en men, especially ones that were formed in war, were especially valuable and tight-knit in the Elizabethan era. This is also mirrored in The Rover, the cavaliers, almost one by one sell Don Pedro out by marrying his sisters and Valeria(their cousin) .Even though they are old friends, the cavaliers deceive Pedro, their friend for a woman. Some critics have argued that distrust of women is the basis of all male bonds19 this is true in The Rover Fredrick warns Bellville of Florindas intentions when she gave him the note with the instructions to meet herHave a care, sir, what you promise this may be a trap laid by her brother to ruin you20The cavaliers initial distrust of women is as take as Benedicks initial misogynistic view of them. When Lucetta is introduced to Blunt all the men knew she was out to trick him, cheat him of all, then have him well-favourly banged, and turned out nude at midnight. They, however do not warn Blunt but instead get a front row seat to mention the humil iation of their friend begin.There are many instances of self-deception in both plays actually. For example Benedick and Beatrice undergo a huge change in perspective after their gulling. Both fall helplessly in love with each other even though they were self-declared heretics of love. Beatrice says she will not love a man until man be made from some other metal than earth21 and Benedick claims he will die a bachelor and will not be born-again and see with (the) eyes (of love) only if he met the perfect woman which, as he describes, is quite an impossible scenario. It is important to note Shakespeares placement of this scene exactly before the one with the deception so we can pipeline the two views, before and after the deception.The difference is crystal clear, Beatrice says Benedick, love on. I will requite thee22and that (her) kindness shall incite (him) to bind (their) loves up in a holy band23. Benedick says that he will be horribly in love with her24 and that when he said he would rather die a bachelor than fall in love (the scene before) he didnt think he would live until he was married. We telling the same with Wilmore from The Rover. His whole life got turned around in the refinement scene with Helena when she convinced him to marry her and putting his past perpetually-amorous life behind him. He forgets his old ways and he is no longer the sexed up Father Captain25 who tries to rape Florinda twice and is continuously rejected by almost every female character in the play His promise which is the bargain is now made26 is his everlasting goodbye to women and a welcome mat to the woman.He is all told self-deceived. Another similar example is Fredrick at the beginning of the play we feel he has an unnatural distrust in women. He seems to warn every one of his friends about women, he even tries to get in on the action when Blunt tries to rape Florindaa barbarous revenge. Claudio also deceives himself into accept he is in love with Hero when really he has not even met her. He falls in love with her because of his esteemed first impression of her and mainly because she looks like a pure, good virgin which was considered of grand importance in Elizabethan England, a girls honour was entirely base on her chastity, if she loses that she would lose all social standing which is why the second thing he asks about her is is she not a modest untried lady?.Don Pedro also deceives himself in thinking his brother, john the bastard has been process clean and is now a clean and changed man. In reality he is the villain and the person behind every harmful deception in the play.The two plays both exhibit deception in the most deceitful of ways. It is both malevolent and benevolent, in the sense that the plays end happily through all the obstacles that have been set throughout it.