Social movements draw attention to the individual in a way that goes against the desire to con bod and fit into hostelry . The American lodge is largely made up of a mixture of roots that possess a breadth of intrench and unchallenged ideologies that decide individuals (Licentia , 2005 . much(prenominal) groups include families , religions , and political parties . It is usually the carapace that movements ar born out of the view that a true entrenched societal practice is unfair , and they be so create to challenge the status quo within that society . When this occurs , much(prenominal) movements be likely to start out as unpopular entities that ar frowned upon by the more prominent and vocal groups within the society . Despite the fact that many people profess to distress individualism , the negative attention t hat is often attracted by such(prenominal) movements makes the adoption of these causes by many individuals unlikely (2005 . In a nonher(prenominal) cases , people atomic number 18 just too busy (and by chance too disinterested ) to take the duration unavoidable for the actuation of s . People shrink from the marginalization that is feasible as well as the time-consuming work that is incumbent , as such effects admit the ability to negatively push on their abilities to perform their roles within the societyIf , for example , a homo person residing in a largely bourgeois base town decides to join a gay insolence group (in reaction to a general and repressive unpopularity of homosexuality - or to homophobia , that person is likely to suffer from ostracism on several(prenominal) levels . In fact , the group might be in public ridiculed by the more established groups (religious or some other ) that make it and argon in opposition to homosexuality .
Such a person might just consider it easier (and less(prenominal) time consuming ) to move to an area where homosexuality is accepted or (barring that ) to practice homosexuality privatelyHowever , in some cases such substitute(a) measures (as moving or keeping lifestyles secret ) are non an option . In those cases , the rules , laws or traditions against which s are form might become so oppressive that it is impossible for the bottle up to continue living In America , where the living standards are high , people have the luxury of not introduction overly concerned with poverty . Such persons are sure-footed to consider more abstract issues and they have the resources t o band in concert and speak out about them . Furthermore , the American laws let the citizens a right to challenge authority , and the media facilitate the adjacent and wide hand out dissemination of information (Licentia 2005 . These are situations favorable to the spread of movements , and individuals who have garnered the courage and tenacity (born , maybe of necessity ) have been able to succeed in s because of these factorsReferenceLicentia , J (2005 . ideological hegemony : thought control in American society drumhead Everything . Retrieved on December 10 , 2007 from http /question- everything .mahost .org /Socio-Politics /thoughtcontrol .htmlPAGEPAGE 2Social movement...If you postulate to nourish a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment