'Dystopian Society Present in 1984 and Fahrenheit 451 Essay\r'

'The root word of a dystopian family is that of double-dyed(a) authorisation, either through the intention of a police call forth that has ultimate visualize over hu art objectity and or the caprice of piece of music abusing technology to further gain control of its subjects. These themes argon truly devote in both raws. In 1984, the totalistic state is technic wholey and urbanely engineered to discern on and guarantee people’s rattling thoughts. In Fahrenheit(postnominal)(postnominal) 451 a similar idea is implementd in the offlawing of literature and the habit of denunciations to baffle and punish those deemed to have broken the law.\r\nThis essay is personnel casualty to explore the idea of Man’s peel against the rules of order which seeks to break him, erasing the mortal, resulting in the mindless slaves to society, the very idea that the authors warn against. In 1984, the constant bombing of information regarding the greatness of the state and Big familiar’s supremacy over the common man forces everyone to consent and rely in the totalitarian state.\r\nThe grammatical constituenty hardlyifies itself by eliminating the individual, giving power to everyone as existence part of the collective power of the fellowship as O’Brien mentions «if he freighter escape from his identity, if he can merge himself in the ships company so that he is the party, then he is all-powerful and divinity » the party’s belief that they control everything notwithstanding human reality portrays how far a totalitarian regimen can go in achieving complete control of humanity.\r\nThis can be clearly seen in 1984, where O’Brien spins Winston to the vertex where he is capable of reach all humanity, all common sense until the point where O’Brien tells Winston that two and two make five. Winston loses all sense of individualisation to the point where conforms to the party and denounces his full-s trength love Julia. Through the use of fear and curtailment oppression, the idea of love apart from love for expectant brother and the party is all that bides. Therefore the society succeed in their aims, obedience through the use of force and fear.\r\nThe central conflict of the novel is Man-vs. Society, as with Fahrenheit 451. Winston constantly disputed for individuality in a society were on that point is no â€Å"I” on that point is only ‘we”, individuality and freedom of stockion is forbidden, penal by death. The party conjurees to control all of humanity, eradicating the â€Å" elicit instinct”, O’Brien says « we will abolish the orgasm » « there will be no loyalty, drop loyalty towards the party. There will be no love, except the love of big brother… there will be no art, no literature, no science », in this, the party’s aims argon clear.\r\nThey seek to destroy what it is to be human, to produce a cosmos of hollow men, loyal to none merely the party, un-thinking, un-loving slaves of the party, tools. As in 1984, the state in Fahrenheit wish to crush creative thinking, eradicating humanity in the process. The burning of books, similar to the book burnings of Nazi Germany certify the totalitarian, dystopian need to control the thoughts of the lot. By doing this, they control the erstwhile(prenominal), and therefore the proximo.\r\nThey atomic number 18 able to rewrite fib to justify their acts, indoctrinating the youth to believe in their cause, just as the Nazis did. In Fahrenheit 451, as in 1984, symbolism and reversible miserlyings are present which can also be seen as conflicting emotions in the protagonist and the struggle to find a maneuver in society. In 451, the separate ideas of flaming and weewee are very interesting. The firemen are not as tradition tells, protectors of the people, putting out fires and saving lives, just using fire to burn and destroy literatu re.\r\nTheir utilisation is to destroy, to burn human creativeness. Captain Beatty, chief of the fire department, believes that â€Å"fire is bright and fire is clean. ” This idea contradicts the norm of fire is destructive and evil. This represents the twisted ideas of authority, reversing the meaning of words, revising them to justify their aims of total control over humanity. The masses fail to see the true meaning of these words, or perhaps they have forgotten. This shows how far the totalitarian government has succeeded in indoctrinating people into believing what ever they wish them to.\r\nHowever, the protagonists in both novels are depicted as being marginalised because they do not share the analogous ideas, due to morals and ideals that they can only express in their minds, far from the reach of the state, a unaccompanied free island in a sea of low-spirited waves. The idea of water by Bradbury is used to clean montag’s soul. The water saves Montag, clea nsing him of the scent of society, he is thus reborn. In addition, when Montag is subdueing to escape the helicopters and the robotic hound, the tools of the totalitarian government, the stream hides and saves him until it is safe to return to land.\r\nMontag indulges himself in the water and â€Å"there was only the cold river and Montag be adrift in a sudden peacefulness, away from the urban center and the lights and the chase, away from everything” in this the water saves him, purifies him, the opposite of the dystopian symbol, fire. Water is portrayed as the flow of humanity. In 1984, the party uses contrasting ideas in their party slogans much(prenominal) as « War is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength » these contrasting ideas represent perfectly the party’s ideals.\r\nThe individual and the freedom that comes with it actually results in slavery in the dystopian society, ignorance of the truth of what the party is really about protects yo u from persecution of the thought police. The use of these contradicting words and the lack of opposition, mean that the party have succeeded in their indoctrination of the masses as no one has the ability to see past the words to see their true sense, still Winston and Julia remain troubled by it. In a dystopian society, the state exerts complete control over its population through oppression, terror and the constant use of propaganda. This is patent in both novels.\r\nBoth novels are expectations of a future controlled by totalitarian states. The thoughtpolice in 1984 use brainwashing, spies and denunciations to control the party however the proles are slackly untouched. This is similar to Nazi Germany in that only those who rebelled or were undesirables in society were subordinateed, the general population remained untouched. By comparing Nazi Germany and the era in which this novel was written, we can see the blatant exemplification against future governments similar to th e National Socialists led by Hitler and the state of terror and oppression and ethic cleansing which was deemed for the great good.\r\nO’Brien says to Winston â€Å"perhaps you have returned to your old idea that the proletarians or the slaves will arise and overthrow us. dictate it out of your mind. They are helpless, like the animals. Humanity is the party. ” This shows the mountain that the totalitarian government controls all that is humanity and the disappoint classes remain irrelevant because they have neither the association nor the power to overthrow those who control reality. They control the laws of nature, the past, the present and the future.\r\nHowever, Fahrenheit 451 does not elaborate on the governmental aims of the ruling party apart from their commit to quash human creativity and the ideas of individuality. Yet it remains a typical part of dystopian ideology to desire to control every aspect of the masses and even humanity itself. The use of the « telescreen » is an interesting concept that is coarse in both texts. The use of the telescreen in Fahrenheit 451 is that this became the populace’s way of interacting with others without physically interacting with them, as people became detached from literature, from freedom.\r\nThe people on these televisions were your â€Å"family”, who would stop you company and be your â€Å"friend”, spurting propaganda and basically keeping people in check. The telescreen in 1984, divided the same idea but consisted of other more than sinister uses such as spying on those suspected of thoughtcrime, revolutionary thoughts against the party, overhearing conversations and playing militaristic unwrap speeches and propaganda techniques seen in Nazi Germany with the peoples radio. However this form of propaganda could never be switched off.\r\nThis shows the ingsoc party’s ability to track every single aspect of humanity and society, the idea that « big brother is watching you « is very advantageously demonstrated. This of course being the reason why Winston and Julia were captured and hurt by the state. The use of the Telescreen can be observe in Winston and Julia’s struggle in that they are constantly bombarded by party propaganda, possibly overheard by the party through speakers hidden in the screen. This creates force to conform for fear of being found out and sent to the ministry of love for reconditioning.\r\nThe underlying fear of the transcendental bound them to neither conform nor rebel. They are befuddled in a society which they cannot escape and do not wish to be a part of, even so they have no choice. I believe that under this amount of pressure, anyone would fall and conform to any(prenominal) the political party demands, as the individual is no gather for the collective power of the company. Winston is not just a character in the story, but an idea. Winston is an anachronism. His mind and temper a re not defined by the Party slogans, by the Party’s ideas of what he should be.\r\nFrom his avow point of view he is an individual; from the Party’s point of view he is a flaw in the reality it is creating. The story follows Winston and his struggle for individualism and his overpowering feelings of humanity, the very feelings that the party try to destroy, which they at long last do through horrific torture spread over months. O’Brien says to him whilst trying to brainwash him « you are the last man…you are the guardian of the human spirit. » Winston then looks into the mirror and sees the frail instrument that he had become.\r\nO’Brien does this to show the extent to which his party can destroy humanity and rebuild it to their designs. He then goes on to say « Do you see that thing facing you? That is the last man. If you are human, that is humanity. » convincing Winston that his struggle in futile, the control of the party is infi nite, they create the law around them to meet their ends of controlling everything, and everyone. Winston is eventually brainwashed and ends up loving bigbrother, thus the aims of the party complete.\r\nIn conclusion, the extent to which 1984 refers to a dystopian society compared to Fahrenheit 451 is at once different yet similar. The ideas of the party relate to those of the Nazis and soviet Russia; the lies, the oppression, the propaganda, the removal of accomplished liberties and the crushing of humanity. However 1984 is an extreme version of this prediction of the future. Fahrenheit explores more the emotional changes in Montag that convinces him to liberate his part in destroying freedom of expression compel by the fireman and the state and to embrace his admiration and his humanity. 984 ends with the destruction of Winston, finally loving bigbrother, his love for Julia destroyed, his individuality crushed they had both failed themselves and each other and addled to power of â€Å"Big Brother. ” Orwell was a firm worshipper in Marxism and the need for the proletarian to rise up and equalise society. These two tales are a warning of the dangers of dystopian societies, the need for humanity to shed this society that has become so desensitised and to be aware of the assurance on technology, before it is too late.\r\n'